DHA-Case Week 1

Description

Choose 1 of the 6 research samples listed in the Required Readings list

Quantitative Descriptive (non-experimental) Survey Design

Berry, J. W. (2016). Burnout, autonomy, and job satisfaction in full-time public community college faculty members: A regional survey and analysis. The University of North Dakota. Published Dissertation (ProQuest).

 

Craighead, A. (2017). A descriptive survey of advanced practice registered nurses’ preparedness for treating geriatric depression. The University of Arizona. Published Dissertation (ProQuest).

 

Lamb, L. C. (2010). Values and health care: The relationship between uninsured and insured status pursuant to the Rokeach value survey. Nova Southeastern University. Published Dissertation (ProQuest).

 

Quantitative Descriptive (non-experimental) Retrospective Design

 

Del Gazio, A. L. (2010). An analysis of the relationships among trauma, posttraumatic stress, health risk behaviors, and physical health using the National Comorbidity survey replication data. University of South Dakota. Published Dissertation (ProQuest).

 

Karimi E Asl, M.M.J. (2014). Exploration of racial and ethnic disparities in health care transition and quality for youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Analysis of 2009-2010 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs. TUI University. Published Dissertation (ProQuest).

 

Lawhorn. J. C. (2019). Exploring parental resilience and the Autism Spectrum Disorder using the 2011 National Survey of Children’s Health. Texas Woman’s University. Published Dissertation (ProQuest).

 

Evaluate the selected study using the Checklist “Criteria for Critiquing a Research Report” on page 390 from the Leedy and Ormrod text by completing:

 

Step 1. The Main Research Problem or Question (3 questions answered Yes or No with applicable explanation, rationale, and evaluative criteria (i.e., 2 strengths and 2 weaknesses).

 

Step 2. Subproblems and Any Related Hypotheses (3 questions answered Yes or NO with applicable explanation, rationale, and evaluative criteria (i.e., 2 strengths and 2 weaknesses).

 

Step 3. Theoretical or Conceptual Framework (3 questions answered Yes or No with applicable explanation, rationale, and evaluative criteria (i.e., 2 strengths and 2 weaknesses).

 

Conclude the Case Assignment by evaluating the Purpose Statement and Significance [Rationale] of the Study with any recommendations for improvement or clarity as applicable.