Assignment: PHI FP 2000 Capella University Medical Ethics Dilemma Applying Ethical Theory Essay
Assignment: PHI FP 2000 Capella University Medical Ethics Dilemma Applying Ethical Theory Essay
Question Description
Compose 2-3 pages in which you respond to a medical ethics dilemma. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies: SHOW MORESHOW LESS
Competency 1: Explain the nature of ethical issues.
Explain the ethical issue in the scenario.
Competency 2: Critically examine the contributions of key thinkers from the history of ethics.
Apply the three traditional theories of normative ethics to the situation.
Competency 3: Engage in ethical debate.
Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the three theories as they relate to this situation.
Competency 4: Develop a position on a contemporary ethical issue.
Apply ethical theory to justify your ethical position on this issue.
Competency 5: Communicate effectively in the context of personal and professional moral discourse.
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of professional communities.
Competency Map
CHECK YOUR PROGRESSUse this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course.
Toggle Drawer
Context
Ethics is about doing what is right. Traditional normative theories express this goal in one of three ways:
Virtue Ethics
Seek personal excellence by cultivating virtuous habits.
Aristotle: Achieve self-sufficiency through moderation.
Deontological Ethics
Do your duty by following the rules.
Kant: Act as any rational agent is bound by universal law.
Consequentialist Ethics
Try to make the world a better place by producing good outcomes.
Mill: Generate more pleasure and less pain for everyone.
SHOW LESSApplying ethical theories to everyday life is not easy, as we consider virtues, duties, and results:
Virtue Ethics
Strengths: Respect for people, moral education, continuing progress.
Problems: No direct advice for specific situations, excuse for self-serving.
Deontological Ethics
Strengths: Simple application of rules, avoid personal responsibility.
Problems: Rigidly strict, conflicting rules, sometimes bad consequences.
Consequentialist Ethics
Strengths: Flexibility in circumstances, outcomes publicly discernible.
Problems: Hard to predict results accurately, especially over the long run.
Using all three is fine, but we need to think through how they cohere or diverge.
Toggle Drawer
Questions to Consider
To deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of the business community.SHOW LESSAs you think about applying ethical theory, consider addressing one of the following questions:
Which of the three approaches to ethical theory makes the most sense, and why?
When might Aristotle, Kant, and Mill disagree about how to handle a specific case?
What theoretical approach are you most likely to employ in particular situations?
Toggle Drawer
Resources
SUGGESTED RESOURCES
The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom.SHOW LESS
Three Approaches
Fieser, J. (n.d.). Ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/ethics/
Pages 1-15.
Hinman, L. M. (2016). Ethical theories. Ethics Updates. Retrieved from http://ethicsupdates.net/theories/index.shtml
Pages 1-2.
Virtue Ethics
Taylor, C. C. W. (2006). Aristotle: Nicomachean ethics, books II-IV. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kemerling, G. (2011). Aristotle: Ethics and the virtues. The Philosophy Pages. Available from http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/2s.htm
Pages 1-3.
Kraut, R. (2014, April 21). Aristotle’s ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics…
Pages 1-27.
Sachs, J. (n.d.). Aristotle: Ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http:// http://www.iep.utm.edu/aris-eth/
Tong, R., & Williams, N. (2009). Feminist ethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics…
Deontology
Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Jankowiak, T. (n.d.). Kant: 5. Moral Theory. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/kantview/#H5
Pages 22-28.
Johnson, R., & Cureton, A. (2016). Kant’s moral philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Spring 2018 Edition. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entrie…
Pages 1-35.
Kemerling, G. (2011). Kant: The moral order. The Philosophy Pages. Available from http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/5i.htm
Pages 1-5.
Consequentialism
Mill, J. S. (2009). Utilitarianism. Auckland, NZ: The Floating Press.
Brink, D. (2014). Mill’s moral and political philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entrie…
Pages 1-72.
Kemerling, G. (2011). Utilitarianism. The Philosophy Pages. Available from http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/5q.htm
Pages 1-5.
Schefczyk, M. (n.d.). John Stuart Mill: Ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/mill-eth/
Pages 1-23.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2015). Consequentialism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2015 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entrie…
Pages 1-25.
More on Ethics
Three Kinds of Normative Theory.
Applying Ethical Theory.
This activity can give you a better understanding of how to apply ethical theories and may be helpful for completing the assessment.
Problem Solving
Skillsoft. (n.d.). Critical thinking essentials: What is critical thinking? [Tutorial].
One of the Essential Undergraduate Learning Outcomes is “Problem-Solving,” which includes the soft skill of thinking critically about significant issues. Since we will be using this throughout the course, you may find it helpful to refresh your skills by viewing this Skillsoft tutorial.
Running time: 1:00:00.
Skillsoft. (n.d.). The building blocks of building trust [Tutorial].
Respectful debate is fundamental to successful problem solving, since everyone has the right to a personal opinion. Trust is an essential part of this. Use this Skillsoft tutorial to grow at building trust in this setting.
Running time: 29:00.
Academic Skills.
Check this page for more resources on critical thinking:
Critical Thinking.
Effective Learning Strategies.
Writing Support
Consult the following resources for academic writing assistance:
Capella Writing Center.
APA Style and Format.
General Education Information Research Skills Library Guide
A Capella University library guide has been created for your use in General Education courses. The General Education Information Research Skills Library Guide contains tips on how to use the Capella University Library to find resources for your General Education courses. You are encouraged to refer to the resources in this library guide to direct your research in this course.Note: This Program Guide supports the Essential Undergraduate Learning Outcome of Information Literacy.
Assessment Instructions
ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW
You have now studied the three approaches to ethical theory (deontological, consequentialist, and virtue theory) as exemplified in the work of Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, and Aristotle. Your assessment is to write an essay applying these three approaches to the following practical case:You are called to consult in the critical care unit of your local hospital. The hospital admits JoEllen, 53, after she takes an overdose of prescription medications with alcohol. On admission, she says, “Not supposed to be here . . . ” and soon becomes uncommunicative. As her condition deteriorates rapidly, her son arrives with a notarized advance directive in which JoEllen specifically asks not to be placed on life support. What should you recommend to the attending health professionals?
ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS
As you write your essay, consider how you would achieve the following:
Explain the ethical issue in this scenario.
Apply the three traditional theories of normative ethics to this situation.
Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the three theories as they relate to this situation.
Apply ethical theory to justify your stance on the right thing to do in this situation.
Your instructor may provide video feedback on your work, as well as complete the official scoring guide for the assessment.
Additional Requirements
Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Format resources and citations according to current APA style guidelines.
Number of resources: Use your judgment to ensure your topic is thoroughly researched. There is no minimum number of resources required.
Length of paper: Submit 2-3 typed, double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Use Arial, 12-point font.
Also Check Out:
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
As a clinical nurse working on a medical surgical unit with an emphasis on orthopedics this writer sees a wide variety of patients across all different populations. In Southern California there is a large population of homeless individuals and families. It is my hope that in my career I can better serve the homeless population.
Homelessness, health disparities, and health inequities are all intertwined creating a difficult situation and negative outcomes for patients. Homelessness is associated with shorter life expectancy and higher morbidity. Patients that are homeless have a decreased availability in both primary and preventative health care leading these patients to have late diagnoses and uncontrolled illness that if treated earlier would lead to better outcomes for the patient (Stafford, A., & Wood, L, 2017).
Access to affordable healthcare is at utmost importance for the homeless population to better diagnose, treat, and manage health. Unfortunately, there are many boundaries in both health and social issues that lead this population to have poor outcomes. As a clinical nurse I work closely with case management and social work to attempt to assist the homeless population. We assist these patients to file for emergency medical assistance, provide the opportunities to find shelter, and fill prescriptions through hospital programs. At my hospital we provide all medications to those that cannot afford it and without insurance through a program called Project Help. Project help allows us to fill all medications at no cost to the patient prior to discharge. By attaining my Master of Science in Nursing with an emphasis in leadership I hope to one day become a manager or a director to better serve my community. We must reduce the impact of homelessness on health, and I believe thru perseverance and collaborating with multidisciplinary teams we can help decrease health disparities.
LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Applying Research Skills Scoring Guide
Criteria | Non-performance | Basic | Proficient | Distinguished |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apply academic peer reviewed journal articles relevant to the health care problem or issue being researched. | Does not describe academic peer reviewed journal articles related to the health care problem or issue being researched. | Describes academic peer reviewed journal articles related to the health care problem or issue being researched. | Applies academic peer reviewed journal articles relevant to the health care problem or issue being researched. | Applies academic peer reviewed journal articles relevant to the health care problem or issue being researched, including why the chosen articles are relevant to the topic. |
Assess the credibility of information and explain the relevance of the information sources. | Does not describe origin of information or relevant aspects of the information sources. | Describes a few of the origins of the information and relevant aspects of the information sources. | Assess the credibility of information and explain the relevance of the information sources. | Assesses the credibility of information, explaining the process used for determining the sources’ credibility, and explains the relevance of the information sources, providing the reasons for considering the sources relevant to the topic. |
Analyze academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format. | Does not analyze academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format. | Analyzes academic peer-reviewed journal articles but fails to use the annotated bibliography format effectively. | Analyzes academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format. | Analyzes academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format, and provides rationale for inclusion of each selected article. |
Summarize what was learned from developing an annotated bibliography. | Does not describe what was learned from developing the annotated bibliography. | Describes a portion of what was learned from developing the annotated bibliography. | Summarizes what was learned from developing an annotated bibliography. | Summarizes what was learned from developing the annotated bibliography, including examples. |
Produce text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors. | Produces text with significant grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors, making text difficult to follow. | Produces text with some grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors, making text difficult to follow at times. | Produces text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors. | Produces text free of grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors. |
Integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style. | Does not integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style. | Integrates into text mostly appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style, but there are lapses in style use. | Integrates into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style. | Integrates into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style without errors and uses current reference sources. |
📚 Need a custom-written assignment from scratch?
Our expert academic writers deliver top-quality, 100% plagiarism-free work that guarantees an A+ grade.
✅ First assignment absolutely FREE!
Use code FREE at checkout for a 100% discount.
Note: We never resell papers. Every order is uniquely crafted just for you.