Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis and Healthcare Insurance Fact Sheet
Description
- Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations.
- Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by each of the last three U.S. presidential administrations.
- Reflect on the focus of their respective agendas, including the allocation of financial resources for addressing the healthcare issue you selected.
- Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.
The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page Fact Sheet)
Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid
Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations and their agendas related to the public health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:
- Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it.
- Describe the administrative agenda focus related to the issue you selected.
- Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.
- Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.
(A draft of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid should be posted to the Module 1 Discussion Board by Day 3 of Week 1.)
Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis
Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:
- Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?
- How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda for the current and two previous presidents? How does it stay there?
- Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?
Part 3: Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief
Based on the feedback that you received from your colleagues in the Discussion, revise Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid and Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis.
Then, using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. You can use Microsoft Word or PowerPoint to create your Fact Sheet or Talking Point Brief. Be sure to address the following:
- Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.
- Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.
Atleast 3 resources used, please try to only use resources that I provide only.
The first attachment is the grid you will need to add to and I will send 5 sources to use and 3 other sites that will be listed below. Please do not use other ones.
DeMarco, R., & Tufts, K. A. (2014). The mechanics of writing a policy brief. Nursing Outlook, 62(3), 219–224. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2014.04.002
Kingdon, J. W. (2001). A model of agenda-setting, with applications. Law Review, M.S.U.-D.C.L., 2(331).
Lamb, G., Newhouse, R., Beverly, C., Toney, D. A., Cropley, S., Weaver, C. A., Kurtzman, E., … Peterson, C. (2015). Policy agenda for nurse-led care coordination. Nursing Outlook, 63(4), 521–530. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2015.06.003
O’Rourke, N. C., Crawford, S. L., Morris, N. S., & Pulcini, J. (2017). Political efficacy and participation of nurse practitioners. Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice, 18(3), 135–148. doi:10.1177/1527154417728514
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Enhancing Environmental Health Content in Nursing Practice, Pope, A. M., Snyder, M. A., & Mood, L. H. (Eds.). (n.d.). Nursing health, & environment: Strengthening the relationship to improve the public’s health. Retrieved September 20, 2018.
POST
This is an example of a reply to another classmate Hello Steven, Abortion is a great concern in our nation and the fact that political parties are not sharing the same point of view creates a major conflict. According to the CDC since 1969, they have been conducting abortion surveillance to document the number and characteristics of women obtaining legal induced abortions in the United States (Jatlaoui et al., 2016, p. 1-41).The most difficult part of this societal problem is that the prevalence of abortion is seen in adolescents, and it is lower among women aged 25–39 years (Jatlaoui et al., 2016, p. 1-41). The other problem is that a great majority of women seeking abortions are economically disadvantaged with no means to care for a child (Upadhyay, Weitz, Jones, Barar, & Foster, 2014).In conclusion I believe that our government needs to come together to solve this problem by educating not only the individuals in the schools setting but to use the one tool that brings this population together social media to raise awareness of the risk factors involved in having an abortion.ReferenceJatlaoui, T. C., Eckhaus, L., Mandel, M. G., Nguyen, A., Oduyebo, T., Petersen, E., & Whiteman, M. K. (2019). Abortion Surveillance — United States, 2016. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 68(11), 1–41. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6811a1Upadhyay, U. D., Weitz, T. A., Jones, R. K., Barar, R. E., & Foster, D. G. (2014). Denial of Abortion Because of Provider Gestational Age Limits in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 104(9), 1687–1694. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.2105/AJP…
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid
Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Identify the allocations of resources that the two presidents dedicated to this issue. |
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response clearly and accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.
|
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.
|
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response is vague or partially inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue.
|
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response is missing or inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue.
|
| Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:
Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency most helpful? How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there? Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected and justify your selection. |
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful.
Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. The response clearly and accurately identifies and justifies the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected. |
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful.
Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. Identification and justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue is included. |
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is vague or inaccurate and justification is inaccurate or misaligned for why that agency is most helpful.
Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate. Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue. |
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing.
Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is inaccurate or missing. Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or missing. |
| Part 3: Fact Sheet
Based on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy- maker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues |
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
Creates an accurate and thorough fact sheet.
Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate synthesis of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues. |
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
Creates an accurate fact sheet.
Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate summary evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues. |
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
Creates a fact sheet that is partially accurate or incomplete.
Response provides an incomplete or inaccurate summary of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. Response partially or inaccurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues. |
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
Creates a fact sheet that is inaccurate or incomplete.
Response provides an inaccurate summary of evidence or evidence is missing on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. Response justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or missing. |
| Resources |
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Response includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.
|
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.
|
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.
|
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response includes 2 or fewer resources.
|
| Written Expression and Formatting: Paragraph
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
|
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
|
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time.
|
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
|
| Written Expression and Formatting: English Writing Standards
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
| Written Expression and Formatting:
The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
|
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
|
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
|
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥5) APA format errors.
|
| Total Points: 100 |
|---|
📚 Need a custom-written assignment from scratch?
Our expert academic writers deliver top-quality, 100% plagiarism-free work that guarantees an A+ grade.
✅ First assignment absolutely FREE!
Use code FREE at checkout for a 100% discount.
Note: We never resell papers. Every order is uniquely crafted just for you.
