NURS 6051 Week 1 Discussion The Application of Data to Problem
NURS 6051 Week 1 Discussion The Application of Data to Problem
According to Stefankiuk, Bosacka, Wanke-Rytt, and Hryniewicz, despite the fact that viral pharyngitis is the most common cause of acute pharyngitis, antibiotics are prescribed for more than half of the patients (2017). When a patient visits a clinic for treatment of acute pharyngitis, a culture can be obtained to help the doctor determine the best course of action (Mastrian & McGonigle, 2017). The practitioner can determine whether antibiotics are needed by using the Application of Data to Problem, a throat swab, and a quick strep test, according to NURS 6051 Week 1 Discussion. Antibiotics should be administered if the quick strep test is positive. Despite their limitations, rapid strep tests can detect Group A streptococci (GAS) in 90% of cases (Stefankiuk, Bosacka, Wanke-Rytt & Hryniewicz, 2017). According to Chang, Chursri, Sangthong, McNeil, Hu, Du, Li, Fan, Zhou, Chongsuvivatwong, and Twang, antibiotic resistance is a growing health issue (2019). Antibiotic use has more than tripled in the last decade, implying that medications previously used to treat minor ailments may no longer be effective (Chang et al., 2019).
References
Chang, Y., Chusri, S., Sangthong, R., McNeil, E., Hu, J., Du, W., Li, D., Fan, X., Zhou, H., Chongsuvivatwog, V., & Tang, L. Chang, Y., Chusri, S., Sangthong, R., McNeil, E., Hu, J., Du, W. (2019). In basic healthcare hospitals in southwest China, there was a clinical trend of antibiotic overuse and misuse. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214779, PLoS ONE, 14 (6), 1-12.
K. Mastrian and D. McGonigle (2017). Information, information science, and information systems are all covered in this course. Nursing Informatics and the Foundations of Knowledge, edited by D. McGonigle and K. Mastrian (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington, MA.
E. Stefaniuk, K. Bosacka, M. Wanke-Rytt, and W. Hryniewicz, E. Stefaniuk, K. Bosacka, K. Wanke-Rytt, M. Wanke-Rytt, M. Wanke-Rytt, M. Wanke (2017). The application of quick tests In the diagnosis and treatment of bacterial pharyngotonsillitis, QuikRead go Strep A. 1733–1738 in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 36, no. 10. 10.1007/s10096-017-2986-8 Doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-2986-8
Also Read:
Application of Data to Problem-Solving Discussion
There are few professions in the modern era that do not rely on data to some way. Market data is used by stockbrokers to provide financial advice to their clients. Weather data is used by meteorologists to forecast weather conditions, while realtors use it to advise on property purchases and sales. Data not only helps solve difficulties in these and other circumstances, but it also adds to the practitioner’s and discipline’s body of knowledge.
states that the nursing profession, too, is increasingly reliant on statistics. Nursing informatics strives to ensure that nurses have access to the information they need to address healthcare problems, make informed decisions in the best interests of patients, and contribute to knowledge.
You will consider a scenario that would benefit from data access and how such access could help with problem-solving and knowledge creation in this Discussion.
How to Get Ready:
Consider the informatics and knowledge work principles offered in the Resources.
Consider a hypothetical scenario that would necessitate or benefit from data access, gathering, and application in your own healthcare practice or organization. A patient, worker, or management issue or gap may be present in your case.
By the third day of Week 1,
Give a brief explanation of the scenario’s main point. Describe the types of data that could be used, as well as how they would be collected and accessed. What kind of information could be gleaned from the data? What clinical reasoning and judgment would a nurse leader use to generate knowledge from this experience?
By the sixth day of Week 1,
according to NURS 6051 Week 1 Discussion The Application of Data to Problem, on two different days, respond to at least two of your colleagues*, asking questions to clarify the scenario and data application, or suggesting additional/alternative suggestions for using nursing informatics principles.
*Please note that your classmates will be referred to as colleagues throughout this program.
Name: NURS_5051_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Posting |
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
| Main Post: Timeliness |
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
|
| First Response |
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
| Second Response |
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
| Participation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
|
| Total Points: 100 |
|---|
📚 Need a custom-written assignment from scratch?
Our expert academic writers deliver top-quality, 100% plagiarism-free work that guarantees an A+ grade.
✅ First assignment absolutely FREE!
Use code FREE at checkout for a 100% discount.
Note: We never resell papers. Every order is uniquely crafted just for you.
