COMP 10017 American Academy of English Principles of Programming Paper

COMP 10017 American Academy of English Principles of Programming Paper

Principles of Programming Paper

Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 1 of 18
Instructions to Student
 Answer all questions.
 Deadline of submission: 19/04/2021 23:59
 The marks received on the assignment will be scaled down to the actual weightage
of the assignment which is 50 marks
 Formative feedback on the complete assignment draft will be provided if the draft is
submitted at least 10 days before the final submission date.
 Feedback after final evaluation will be provided by 03/05/2021
Module Learning Outcomes
The following LOs are achieved by the student by completing the assignment successfully
1) Describe the fundamentals of programming and the use of representing programming
logic/numbers
2) Use different data types and operators in a programming language
3) Use different program control statements in a programming language
Assignment Objective
The aim of this assignment is to the test student’s ability to use data types, various decision making and
Iterative constructs to solve specific problems using Java programming language.
Assignment Tasks
1) Task 1 : Work proposal (10 marks)
Submit a work proposal for this assignment on or before 25/03/2021 (23:59) which must include:
1. Understanding of deliverables – initial understanding of solution to task2, task3, task4, task 5 and
task6.
a. For task 3, the student is requested to form 4 different expressions. Each expression
must have the following criteria:
i. Using 4 different algebraic operators, one modulus operator and five operands
that you initialize with different values.
IN SEMESTER (INDIVIDUAL) ASSIGNMENT
Module Code: COMP 10017 Module Name: Principles of Programming
Level: 1 Max. Marks: 100
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 2 of 18
ii. Using 5 different relational operators and five operands that you initialize with
different values.
iii. Using 5 Boolean operators of three types and five operands that you initialize
with different values.
iv. Using 5 different algebraic and relational operators and five operands that you
initialize with different values.
Use parentheses as per your choice.
b. For task 4, if you will choose option a) or option b), select an example of problem that
you will analyze later in the report and which includes a checking process.
Examples of problems:
i. Purchasing a product online and checking the validity of the credit card
ii. Registering the modules for a student and checking if the session selected is not
full
iii. Making an appointment with a doctor and checking if the time selected is
available
iv. Making an online order for food and checking if there is any offer on the
selected items to apply.
2. General overview of proposed plan -Timeline for completion of the given tasks.
3. List of resources. Please note that the resource that will be used for Task 3.a must not be changed
in the final assignment submission.
The work proposal must be submitted in a word file through the link available in Moodle.
Task 2: Understanding from pre-class activities (10 marks)
Demonstrate your understanding on the topics given below by going through pre-class asynchronous
materials provided to you on MEC Learn (week 2 – week 5) and completing the quizzes given at MEC Learn
as per the due dates.
a. Fundamentals of programming
b. Flow charts
c. Operators
d. Conditional statements
Task 3: Operators (20 marks)
In this task, you need to evaluate the four expressions that were considered in the proposal and
demonstrate at least 4 steps of evaluating them.
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 3 of 18
Task 4: SDLC (20 marks)
ABC is a company specialized in Software Development. To build software applications with high quality,
Program Development Life Cycle process is followed. It contains 5 phases: Analyzing, Designing, Coding,
Testing and Maintaining.
The student must select one of the following questions:
a. Explain how the Analysis phase will be applied for the considered scenario in the proposal. You
need to determine the list of classes that will be implemented and, for the main program, the
list of inputs, outputs and the process.
b. Apply the design phase using the flow chart on the considered scenario from the proposal. You
need to have input, output, at least 2 calculations and one conditional statement.
c. Apply the Coding phase on the following problem:
To find the total marks of a student in an assignment, we need to get the proposal marks, Task 2, Task 3
and Task 4 marks. The total mark, T, must be calculated as the total of all these marks. The final mark F,
is then calculated as T minus the penalty, P, applied for late submission. P is calculated as 5% multiplied
by the number of working days after the deadline N multiplied by T.
Note: we assume that N is less or equal to 5.
Write the Java program that reads the required input from the keyboard and displays the result as the
student name, student id and final marks.
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 4 of 18
Task 5: Using conditions (20 marks)
An instructor wants to give feedback to students in an assignment according to the number of correctly
solved programs.
Example of feedback :
Nb of correct programs Feedback
0 incomplete assignment
1 partially correct assignment
2 Satisfactory attempt
3 Good attempt
4 Excellent attempt
The following figure shows an example of execution.
Write the Java program that reads the number of correctly solved programs and displays the adequate
feedback.
Note: Choose your own feedback message and do not copy from the previous table. Use any of the
conditional statements like if-else/ if-else-if/switch case.
Task 6: Using Conditions (20 marks)
1. Refer to MEC Student Academic Integrity policy and write the program that will display the right
penalty according to the student history, type of assessment and type of offence.
You can find more details on MEC Student Academic Integrity policy in section 1 of this document. It will
be sufficient for the student to handle the sections from 1.1 to 1.4.
The following figure shows an example of execution.
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 5 of 18
Another example:
Rules & Regulations:
 All resources should be cited using CU Harvard style.
 The final assignment must have a Title page, Table of Contents, References/ bibliography using
CU Harvard Style and page numbers.
 Title Page must have Assignment Name, Module name, Session, your name, ID, and the name of
the faculty.
 Softcopy in word format is to be submitted through Turnitin link on Moodle.
 Viva will be conducted after the assignment submission as per the dates informed earlier.
Guidelines:
 Assignment must be computer typed.
 Font – Times New Roman
 Font – Style – Regular
 Font – Size – 12
 Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Capital and Underline.
 Explain with suitable diagrams wherever required. Diagrams must be drawn using suitable
software or by pencil.
 Each student has to do the assignment individually / Students have to do the assignment
collaboratively and each student should write a brief reflection on their contribution and learnings
from group work.
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 6 of 18
 You can refer books in E-Library or use internet resource. But you should not cut and paste
material from internet nor provide photocopied material from books. The assignment answers
should be in your own words after understanding the matter from the above resources.
Assessment Evaluation Criteria
Classification
And % Range
Knowledge and
Understanding /
Application of Theory /
Evidence of Reading
Technical / Practical
Skills
Reflection and critical
analysis
General / Transferable
skills*
First Class
Outstanding
94 -100
 Outstanding
knowledge and depth
of understanding of
principles and
concepts.
 Outstanding ability to
apply the theoretical
concepts by
considering of
information
systematically.
 Evidence of reading a
wide range of
educational
literature/research and
where applicable
workplace strategies,
policies and
procedures.
 Tasks completed with
very high accuracy.
 Outstanding skills in
interpretation of
results / and
accomplishing
practical tasks.
 Demonstrates high
degree of autonomy in
completing tasks
 Outstanding skills for
critical analysis,
evaluation and
synthesizing.
 Outstanding reflective
practices,
demonstrating
outstanding personal
learning and growth,
insight into required
professional values
and principles and
professional
development planning.
 Original Findings
presented with
conviction and justified
very well
 Outstanding ability to
use learning resources
 Outstanding
presentation, logically
structured, using
accurate grammar and
spelling.
 Mostly correct crossreferencing and links
to supporting evidence
 Outstanding ability to
communicate the
information verbally
and in writing.
 Outstanding ability to
work in groups and to
manage teams.
 Outstanding ability to
learn autonomously.
 Very accurate
referencing and
bibliography using
appropriate
referencing style
 Outstanding problem
solving skills and
outstanding decisionmaking skills.
Excellent
84 – 93.99
 Excellent knowledge
and depth of
understanding of
principles and
concepts.
 Excellent ability to
apply the theoretical
concepts by
considering of
 Tasks completed with
high accuracy.
 Excellent skills in
interpretation of
results / and
accomplishing
practical tasks.
 Excellent skills for
critical analysis,
evaluation and
synthesizing.
 Excellent reflective
practices,
demonstrating
excellent personal
learning and growth,
 Excellent ability to use
learning resources
 Excellent presentation,
logically structured,
using accurate
grammar and spelling.
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 7 of 18
information
systematically.
 Evidence of beyond the
minimum expected
range of of educational
literature/research and
where applicable
workplace strategies,
policies and
procedures.
insight into required
professional values
and principles and
professional
development planning.
 Findings presented
with conviction and
justified well
 Mostly correct crossreferencing and links
to supporting evidence
 Excellent ability to
communicate the
information verbally
and in writing.
 Excellent ability to
work in groups and to
manage teams.
 Excellent ability to
learn autonomously.
 Accurate referencing
and bibliography using
appropriate
referencing style
 Excellent problem
solving skills for
decision-making skills.
Second Class, Upper Division
Very Good
77 – 83.99
 Very good knowledge
and depth of
understanding of
principles and
concepts.
 Very good ability to
apply the theoretical
concepts by
considering of
information
systematically.
 Evidence of reading a
very good number of
educational
literature/research and
where applicable
workplace strategies,
policies and
procedures.
 Tasks completed with
very good accuracy.
 Very good skills in
interpretation of
results / and
accomplishing
practical tasks.
 Very good skills for
critical analysis,
evaluation and
synthesizing.
 Very good reflective
practices,
demonstrating very
Good personal learning
and growth, insight
into required
professional values
and principles and
professional
development planning.
 Findings presented
with conviction with
very good justification
 Very good ability to use
learning resources
 Very good
presentation, logically
structured, using
accurate grammar and
spelling.
 Mostly correct crossreferencing and links
to supporting evidence
 Very good ability to
communicate the
information verbally
and in writing.
 Very good ability to
work in groups and to
manage teams.
 Very good ability to
learn autonomously.
 Precise referencing
and bibliography using
appropriate
referencing style
 Very good problem
solving skills decisionmaking skills.
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 8 of 18 Second Class, Lower Division
Good
70 – 76.99
 Good knowledge and
depth of
understanding of
principles and
concepts.
 Good ability to apply
the theoretical
concepts by
considering of
information
systematically.
 Evidence of reading a
good number of
educational
literature/research and
where applicable
workplace strategies,
policies and
procedures.
 Tasks completed with
good accuracy.
 Good skills in
interpretation of
results / and
accomplishing
practical tasks.
 Good skills for critical
analysis, evaluation
and synthesizing.
 Good reflective
practices,
demonstrating good
personal learning and
growth, insight into
required professional
values and principles
and professional
development planning.
 Findings presented
with conviction and
good justification.
 Good ability to use
learning resources
 Good presentation,
logically structured,
using accurate
grammar and spelling.
 correct crossreferencing and links
to supporting evidence
 Good ability to
communicate the
information verbally
and in writing.
 Good ability to work in
groups and to manage
teams.
 Good ability to learn
autonomously.
 Good referencing and
bibliography using
appropriate
referencing style
 Good problem solving
skills and decisionmaking skills.
Third Class
Satisfactory
60 – 69.99
 Satisfactory knowledge
and depth of
understanding of
principles and
concepts.
 Fair application of the
theoretical concepts by
considering of
information
systematically.
 Evidence of reading a
fair number of
educational
literature/research and
where applicable
workplace strategies,
policies and
procedures.
 Tasks completed with
satisfactory accuracy.
 Satisfactory skills in
interpretation of
results / and
accomplishing
practical tasks.
 Satisfactory skills for
critical analysis,
evaluation and
synthesizing.
 Satisfactory reflective
practices,
demonstrating fair
personal learning and
growth, insight into
required professional
values and principles
and professional
development planning.
 Findings presented
with conviction and
satisfactory
justification.
 Satisfactory
presentation, logically
structured, using
accurate grammar and
spelling.
 Satisfactory crossreferencing and links
to supporting evidence
 Satisfactory ability to
communicate the
information verbally
and in writing.
 Satisfactory ability to
work in groups and to
manage teams.
 Satisfactory ability to
learn autonomously.
 Satisfactory
referencing and
bibliography using
appropriate
referencing style
 Satisfactory problem
solving skills and
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 9 of 18
exceptionally
competent for
decision-making.
Acceptable
/ Pass
50 – 59.9
 Basic knowledge and
depth of
understanding of
principles and
concepts.
 Basic ability to apply
the theoretical
concepts by
considering of
information
systematically.
 Evidence of reading a
few number of
educational
literature/research and
where applicable
workplace strategies,
policies and
procedures.
 Tasks completed with
minimum acceptable
accuracy.
 Acceptable skills in
interpretation of
results / and
accomplishing
practical tasks.
 Basic skills for critical
analysis, evaluation
and synthesizing.
 Basic reflective
practices,
demonstrating some
personal learning and
growth, insight into
required professional
values and principles
and professional
development planning.
 Findings presented
with conviction and
acceptable
justification.
 Acceptable
presentation, logically
structured, using
accurate grammar and
spelling.
 Acceptable crossreferencing and links
to supporting evidence
 Basic ability to
communicate the
information verbally
and in writing.
 Basic ability to work in
groups and to manage
teams.
 Basic ability to learn
autonomously.
 Basic referencing and
bibliography using
appropriate
referencing style
 Basic problem solving
skills and decisionmaking skills.
Fail / Poor
<50
 Inadequate knowledge
and understanding of
principles and
concepts.
 Poor application of the
theoretical concepts
 No evidence of reading
educational
literature/research and
where applicable
workplace strategies,
policies and
procedures.
 Tasks not completed
 Poor skills in
interpretation of
results / and
accomplishing
practical tasks.
 Poor skills for critical
analysis, evaluation
and synthesizing.
 Poor reflective
practices,
demonstrating some
personal learning and
growth, insight into
required professional
values and principles
and professional
development planning.
 Findings presented
unconvincingly with
improper justification.
 Poor presentation,
logically structured,
using accurate
grammar and spelling.
 Inadequate crossreferencing and links
to supporting evidence
 Poor ability to
communicate the
information verbally
and in writing.
 Poor ability to work in
groups and to manage
teams.
 Poor ability to learn
autonomously.
 Inadequate
referencing and
bibliography using
appropriate
referencing style
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 10 of 18
 Poor problem solving
skills and decisionmaking skills.
Important Policies to be followed
1. Student Academic Integrity Policy*:
 MEC upholds the spirit of academic integrity in all forms of academic work and any form of
violation of academic integrity shall invite severe penalty. Any benefit obtained by indulging
in the act of violation of academic integrity shall be cancelled.
 MEC also reserves the right to notify the appropriate law enforcement authorities of any
unlawful activity and to cooperate thereafter in any investigation of such activity.
 Faculty can conduct a viva to investigate and ascertain that the work submitted is student’s
own work as per the guidelines for the same. A student can be given a maximum of 2
chances to attend the viva in such cases. It is expected that the student attends the viva
during the first chance itself unless due to extenuating circumstances. If the student does
not attend the viva in spite of being given 2 chances and fails to submit valid reasons,
he/she will be awarded a fail in the module and this shall be counted as a case of academic
integrity violation.
All cases of violation of academic integrity on the part of the student shall fall under any of the below
mentioned categories:
1. Plagiarism
2. Malpractice
3. Ghost Writing
4. Collusion
5. Other cases
If the student fails a module and has a proven case of academic integrity violation in this module,
the student is required to re-register the module. This is applicable to first and second offence of
academic integrity violation of plagiarism type
1.1. First Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:
1.1.1. Plagiarism
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 11 of 18
a. If a student is caught first time in an act of academic integrity violation during
his/her course of study in any assignment other than project work and if the type
of violation is plagiarism, then the student will be allowed to re-submit the
assignment once as per the period allowed for re submission However, a penalty
of deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be
imposed.
b. Period of re-submission: The student will have to re-submit the work within one
week (5 working days) from the date he or she is advised to re-submit.
c. Re-submission of the work beyond the allowed period of resubmission will not be
accepted and the assessment will be awarded a zero mark.
d. If the re-submitted work (within the allowed period of resubmission) is also found
to be plagiarized, then that assessment component will be awarded a zero mark.
It shall also contribute to the total count of academic integrity violation for that
student.
e. If plagiarism is detected in UG Project work (Project 1, Project Planning and Project
Design and Implementation), the above clauses do not apply, and the work will be
summarily rejected. In these cases the student will be awarded a fail (F) grade and
is required to reregister the module.
1.1.2. Malpractice / Ghostwriting / Collusion
If a student is caught first time in an act academic integrity violation during his/her course
of study for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester and
if the type of violation is Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion, then the student shall fail
the module.
1.2. Second Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:
1.2.1. Plagiarism
a. If any student is caught second time in an act of academic integrity violation during
his/her course of study and if the type of violation is plagiarism, then the student
will not be allowed to resubmit the work, and s/he will directly be awarded zero
for the work in which plagiarism is detected.
b. The student shall also receive a warning of suspension in such cases.
1.2.2. Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion
a. If a student is caught a second time in an act academic integrity violation for an
assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester and if the type
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 12 of 18
of violation is Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion, then the student shall fail the
module.
b. The student shall also receive a warning of suspension in such cases.
1.3. Third Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:
a. If a student is caught a third time in an act of academic integrity violation for an
assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester then the student
shall fail the module and also shall be suspended for one semester from the College,
once the academic integrity violation case is confirmed by Institutional Assessment
Review Committee.
b. The student shall be suspended for the immediate subsequent semester and can
register for modules only after having served the suspension period fully. This is also
applicable for semesters offered in block mode.
c. During the suspension period, the student shall have to mandatorily complete a course
on academic integrity/writing before s/he can register for any modules.
d. During the period of suspension, the student shall be allowed to attempt
supplementary examinations if s/he is eligible for the same. S/he shall also be allowed
access to all college facilities permitted for a regular student except for registering the
modules.
1.4. Fourth Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:
a. If a student is caught a fourth time in an act of academic integrity violation for an
assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall
fail the module and also shall be expelled from the College, once the case is confirmed
by Institutional Assessment Review Committee.
b. The student shall be expelled from the college and all access to the college facilities
and premises shall cease to exist. The documents shall be released only after getting
the NOC (No Objection Certificate) from Registration Office.
c. `On termination, the student shall not be refunded any fees paid for the academic
semester in which academic integrity violation was observed.
1.5. Other cases
If a student commits an act of academic integrity violation as per the definition of “other
cases” mentioned in the previous section or of a different nature, student’s case shall be
forwarded to an Institutional Assessment Review Committee, Chaired by the Associate
Dean, Academic Affairs. The committee shall investigate the case by means of a viva and/or
a hearing of the parties concerned if required and shall take appropriate decision. The
penalty that can be granted to a proven case of academic integrity violation which falls in
this category of “other cases” can be a warning/component zero/ module
fail/suspension/expulsion depending on the nature and gravity of the offence.
1.6. Types/Variations of cases of Plagiarism and associated actions
Type 1: In case plagiarism is detected in any component or part submission (submitted at
different times) of one assessment (assignment), the deduction in marks will be applicable
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 13 of 18
for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the component or partsubmission alone
needs to be resubmitted.
Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be
considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether plagiarism is on
account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all
students.
If some students in the group are eligible to re-submit (first offence) and others are not
eligible, only eligible students will be allowed to re-submit within a period of one week and
the penalty will be applied as per the policy for each student according to his / her history of
violations.
Type 3: Combination of Type 1 and Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in any component
or part submission (submitted at different times) of a group assessment (assignment), the
deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the
component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. All students of the group
would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether
plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be
applied to all the students of the group.
If some students in the group are eligible to re-submit (first offence) and others are not
eligible, only eligible students will be allowed to re-submit within a period of one week and
the penalty will be applied as per the policy for each student according to his / her history of
violation.
Type 4: Variation of Type 1 and Type 2: In cases where the assessment consists of
components or part submissions that could be a group assessment component (e.g. group
assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual reflection), the
following will be applicable:
a. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group will
be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, irrespective of whether plagiarism
is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to
all students of the group. In such cases the group assessment component will be resubmitted.
If some students in the group are eligible to re-submit (first offence) and others are not
eligible, only eligible students will be allowed to re-submit within a period of one week and
the penalty will be applied for each student according to his / her history of violation.
b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual assessment
component will be resubmitted – if the student is eligible for resubmission-. The policy will
then be applied to that student alone.
c. In both cases (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole
assessment (assignment).
1.7. Types/Variation of Cases of Multiple Offences
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 14 of 18
If student is caught with multiple violations of same or different nature in different modules
of the same semester, they will be considered as one offence and student will be penalized
for each violation according to the type of the offence.
If student is caught with multiple violations of same or different nature in the same module
of the same semester, then they will be considered as different offences and each will
contribute to the overall count of AIV. The student then shall be penalized for each violation
according to the count and type of each offence.
* For further details Refer to MEC Student Academic Integrity Policy in Student Handbook.
2. Late Submission Regulations:
It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments.
As per the Assessment Policy at MEC, late submissions are allowed for one week (5 working days)
for all UG modules with a penalty. In such cases, a deduction of 5% of the marks obtained for the
submitted work shall be imposed for each working day following the last date of submission
till the date of actual submission. Assessment documents submitted beyond a period of one
week (5 working days) after the last date of submission will not be accepted and will be awarded
a zero for that assessment. In cases where the submission has been delayed due to extenuating
circumstances, the student may be permitted to submit the work without imposing the late
submission policy stated above. The extended period of submission will be one week from the
original last date of submission. In such cases, the student is expected to submit the supporting
certificates on or before the original last date of submission of the assessment and the decision
of extension rests with faculty responsible for the assessment .The late submission policy shall be
applied if the student fails to submit the work within one week of the original last date of
submission.
Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if
required.
3. Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy
To protect and respect the rights, dignity, health, safety, and privacy of research subjects involved
including the welfare of animals and the integrity of environment, all student projects are
expected to be undertaken as per the MEC Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy. Accordingly the
following shall apply.
 Research and other enterprise activities shall be conducted by maintaining the high ethical
standards consistent with national and international standards and conventions.
 Any research at MEC that is categorized as high-risk research shall be subject to review and
approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee.
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 15 of 18
 Research activities involving collection of human or animal tissues and manipulation of microbial,
animal or plant cells shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety
Committee.
 Participants involved in research must be informed about the purpose of research and intended
uses of research findings. Written consent must be obtained from people involved prior to the
commencement of research.
 Data obtained from participants must be treated with high confidence and should be used only
for the intended purpose of research.
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 16 of 18

Assignment Evaluation Grid
System Programming and Component Based Technologies – Spring 2021
Student ID:____________ Student Name:_________ Session:__
Deliver
ables
Aspects Mark Range: 0-10 Mark
s
Task 1 Proposal
Submissi
on
 Understanding of deliverables – a detail description of Task 2, Task 3 and Task 4 and
Task 5.
 List of resources
 Timeline for completion of the given tasks.
Deliver
ables
Aspects 0 1-4 5-7 8-9 10 Mark
s
Task 2 Understa
nding
from
pre-class
activities
No attempt Incomplete
/brief
description
of
understan
ding/quizz
es are
partially
attempted
Description of
understanding is
satisfactory/most
of the quizzes are
attempted but
score in pre-class
activities is less
than average
Good description of
understanding /all
the quizzes are
attempted but and
score is good
Excellent
description of
understandin
g / all quizzes
are
attempted
with full
marks
Deliver
ables
Aspects 0 1-9 10-15 16-18 19-20 Mark
s
Task 3 Operator
evaluati
on
No attempt Partially
correct/inc
omplete
The number of
operators is less
than 5/ the number
of expressions is
less than 4/ the
number of steps is
less than 4/
solution partially
correct
5 operators are
used
/3 different types/
5 different values of
operands and
appropriate
type/minor
mistakes in the
evaluation/one
step is repeated or
missing
5 operators
are used
, 3 different
types, 5
different
values of
operands and
appropriate
type, correct
evaluation
with 4 steps
Deliver
ables
Aspects 0 1-9 10-15 16-18 19-20 Mark
s
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 17 of 18
Task 4.a SDLCAnalysis
phase
No attempt Partially
correct/inc
omplete
Explanation is
provided but lacks
clarity/ application
on the scenario is
not detailed/
required numbers
of input, output,
calculations and
classes is not
respected
Good explanation,
Good application on
the scenario,
required number of
input, output,
classes and process
is provided but can
be more pertinent
Definition of
Analysis
phase, clear
explanation
for the given
scenario,
minimum two
classes
identified, 4
input with
explanation, 4
output with
explanation,
process
including two
calculations
with
explanation
Deliver
ables
Aspects 0 1-9 10-15 16-18 19-20 Mark
s
Task
4.b
SDLCDesign
phase
No attempt Partially
correct/inc
omplete
Incomplete flow
chart/ overall
correctness is
satisfactory, some
shapes are
incorrect
Good flow chart/
the overall
correctness is good.
/relevant input,
process and output
Correct
shapes,
includes start
and end,
input, output,
calculation,
condition
Deliver
ables
Aspects 0 1-9 10-15 16-18 19-20 Mark
s
Task 4.c SDLCCoding
phase
No attempt Partially
correct/inc
omplete
Basic structure of
the program is
correct/ no output,
some syntax
mistakes
No output but the
program is good
with minor
mistakes
Correct
program,
comments
added when
useful, correct
output is
shown
Deliver
ables
Aspects 0 1-9 10-15 16-18 19-20 Mark
s
Task 5 Program
using
conditio
ns
No attempt Partially
correct/inc
omplete
Basic structure of
the program is
correct/ no output,
some syntax
mistakes
No output but the
program is good
with minor
mistakes
Correct
program,
comments
added when
useful, correct
output is
shown
Principles Of Programming (COMP 10017) – Spring – 2021 – CW 1(Assignment) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 18 of 18
Deliver
ables
Aspects 0 1-9 10-15 16-18 19-20 Mark
s
Task 6 Program
using
conditio
ns
No attempt Partially
correct/inc
omplete
Basic structure of
the program is
correct/ no output,
some syntax
mistakes
No output but the
program is good
with minor
mistakes
Correct
program,
comments
added when
useful, correct
output is
shown