Decoding the Ethics Codes

Decoding the Ethics Codes

Ethical codes are adopted by organizations to assist members in understanding the difference between  and  and in applying that understanding to their decisions. An ethical code generally implies documents at three levels: codes of ,  for employees, and codes of professional practice.

Ethics or moral philosophy is a branch of  that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending  of right and wrong . The field of ethics, along with aesthetics, concerns matters of , and thus comprises the branch of  called .

Ethics seeks to resolve questions of human  by defining concepts such as , right and ,  and ,  and . As a field of  inquiry, moral  also is related to the fields of , , and .

Three major areas of study within ethics recognized today are:

1. , concerning the theoretical meaning and reference of moral propositions, and how their  (if any) can be determined
2. , concerning the practical means of determining a moral course of action
3. , concerning what a person is  (or permitted) to do in a specific situation or a particular domain of action.

The  (APA) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (for short, the Ethics Code, as referred to by the APA) includes an introduction, preamble, a list of five aspirational principles and a list of ten enforceable standards that  use to guide ethical decisions in practice, research, and education. The principles and standards are written, revised, and enforced by the APA. The code of conduct is applicable to psychologists in a variety of areas across a variety of contexts. In the event of a violation of the code of conduct, the APA may take action ranging from termination of the APA membership to the loss of licensure, depending on the violation. Other professional organizations and licensing boards may adopt and enforce the code.

The first version was published by the APA in 1953. The need for such a document came after psychologists were taking on more professional and public roles post-. A committee was developed and reviewed situations submitted by psychologists in the field who felt they had encountered ethical dilemmas. The committee organized these situations into themes and included them in the first document which was 170 pages in length. Over the years, a distinction was made between aspirational principles and enforceable standards. Since, there have been nine revisions with the most recent published in 2002 and amended in 2010.

Despite the development and use of a complete ethical code, there have still been ethical violations and controversies. For instance, although the APA takes an explicit stance against , this treatment remains controversial amongst many psychologists and religious groups and is still being practiced by some. There is also some disagreement within the field about the ethical implications of using a treatment that may be less effective than another known treatment, although some psychologists argue that all therapy treatments are equally effective (see: the ). The APA has also been implicated in helping the  to continue “” of detainees under the . This presented an obvious violation of the organization’s code of ethics and has been addressed by the APA in the form of reports, responses to media outlets, amendments to policies, and rejections of the allegations.