Discussion: The Inclusion of Nurses in the Systems Development Life Cycle
NURS 6051
Discussion: The Inclusion of Nurses in the Systems Development Life Cycle
The Inclusion of Nurses in the Systems Development Life Cycle SAMPLE 1
The involvement of nurses in every stage of the is critical when purchasing and implementing new health information technology systems. The primary implications associated with the failure are inclusive of the potential loss of engagement of the nurses are the primary care providers since their attention is inadequately captured (East & Robinson, 2017). The next complexity associated with the practice is creating an environment that lacks trust in the change process and reliability in the competence and experience of the change implementers. Moreover, this is attributed to the concept that new systems integrate competing priorities that are viable to decline the interest of target nurses (French-Bravo & Crow, 2018). As a result, this triggers instances of frustration and employee burnout. The other implication is that conceptualized individual goals and nurse beliefs and ideologies may not align with the organizational values. Hence, this contributes to a loss of individualistic connection with the new system leading to inefficiency.
The initial involvement of nurses triggers commitment to the as they are empowered and encouraged to participate in different stages of the SDLC. Further, the participation helps overcome the challenges by allowing for the connection of the nurses to the delivery care systems leading to personalized relationships and motivation when serving patient populations (Chreim et al., 2020). Moreover, this effectively prompts dedication of time and efforts towards implementing the new system. If the nurses are not effectively involved in the process, it implies that the first contact with the system is during the implementation. It limits the nurse’s scope of the specific details integrated making, which potentially delays the execution process (East & Robinson, 2017). In my organizational setting, I have been involved in planning a new healthcare technology that aims to improve service provision to patients by minimizing the time spent in consultation and prescription. The involvement eased the implementation process as I understood the core elements of the proposals and could help others execute the program effectively, resulting in quality patient outcomes.
References
Chreim, S., Williams, B. B., Janz, L., & Dastmalchian, A. (2020). Change agency in a primary health care context: The case of distributed leadership. Health care management review, 35(2), 187-199.
East, L., & Robinson, J. (2017). Change in the process: bringing about change in health care through action research. Journal of clinical nursing, 3(1), 57-61.
French-Bravo, M. & Crow, G. (2018). Shared Governance: The Role of Buy-In In Bringing About Change. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 20(2).
Debora, geat point of views.
I am also agreeing with you in reference to The initial involvement of nurses triggers commitment to the proposed systems as they are empowered and encouraged to participate in different stages of the SDLC. We need nurses in al aspect of SDLC process. According to McGonigle and Mastrian (2018), the Systems Delopement Life Cycle (SDLC) is similar to the nursing progress were nurses use assessment, diagnosis, planning, implenting, and evaluation when caring for our patients.
It is also essential for nurses to be involved in the initial phases of the SDLC process. There are several issues should be considered before proceeding
with an analysis plan:
1. It may be necessary to adjust for patient care
unit, timeofday, or patient volume to account
for possible confounding.
2. Consider the structure and roles of staff,
especially between organizations. For example,
one site may hire nursing assistants; therefore,
nurses in this organization may perform less
administrative work than those in an
organization without nursing assistants.
3. Your data collection and analysis plan should be
based on sound methodology. To achieve valid
results, consider planning your analysis with the
input of a trained statistician to determine
sample size and appropriate statistical
techniques. It is not uncommon to begin
analyzing data, only to find the original
statistical plan was flawed, leaving you with
data that is inadequate for analysis.
4. Because of the complex environments of
inpatient organizations, implementing health
IT is not just a technical undertaking. Multiple
factors from the implementation could cause
changes in nurses’ work, including policy
changes and training. Consider having a trained
human factors professional review your plan
Reference
McGonigle, D., & Mastrain, K.G (2018). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th Ed.). Jones and Bartlett learning.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.a). Health IT evaluation toolkit and evaluation measures quick reference guide. Retrieved January 26, 2022, from https://digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-evaluationkit
Name: NURS_5051_Module05_Week09_Discussion_Rubric
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Main Posting |
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Main Post: Timeliness |
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
|
First Response |
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
Second Response |
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
Participation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
|
Total Points: 100 |
---|
📚 Need a custom-written assignment from scratch?
Our expert academic writers deliver top-quality, 100% plagiarism-free work that guarantees an A+ grade.
✅ First assignment absolutely FREE!
Use code FREE at checkout for a 100% discount.
Note: We never resell papers. Every order is uniquely crafted just for you.