In the essay “Existentialism,” Sartre responds to three possible…

In the essay “Existentialism,” Sartre responds to three possible objections raised against existentialism:

That existentialists are anarchists, or “You’re able to do anything, no matter what” (pg. 41).
That existentialist are “unable to pass judgment on others, because there’s no reason to prefer one configuration to another” (pg. 40).
That “Everything is arbitrary in this choosing of yours” (pg. 40-41), or “values aren’t serious, since you choose them” (pg. 48)

Discuss one of these objections. On what basis would someone say this about Sartre’s theory of existentialism? (Discussion of objection raised against existentialism)
How does Sartre counter the objection (or, why does Sartre not consider it to be a damaging objection)? On what basis does Sartre continue to argue for existentialism despite the objection raised? (Discussion of Sartre’s response to the objection)
Is Sartre successful in countering the objection? Is it an objection that renders existentialism false or dangerous as a philosophical theory? (Critical discussion of Sartre’s response)