N511` Module 4: Assignment – Pharmaceutical Treatment of Endocrine and Immunity Disorders Web Page

N511 Module 4: Assignment – Pharmaceutical Treatment of Endocrine and Immunity Disorders Web Page

N511 Module 4: Assignment:

Be sure to note the required essay lengths. Additionally, each question should have at least one scholarly source other than the textbook.

Exercises:

For each of the following medications discuss causes and consequences of noncompliance and possible solutions.
- Cephalosporins
- Corticosteriods
- Sulfonulureas (as an adjunct to insulin therapy)
- Levothyroxine

Professional Development. Each essay-answer should contain at least one scholarly source other than the textbook.

Locate two scholarly articles regarding vaccines, one must be a research study, and neither can be editorials. Use scientific reasoning and pathophysiologic explanations, along with the two articles, to defend or refute the use of vaccines in children.
Consider the physiologic alterations in diabetes mellitus. Discuss at least five medications you might see prescribed for a diabetic patient. Why would each be prescribed? What is its mechanism of action? What are the risks and benefits of each medication? What patient education is needed?

Remember to submit your work following the file naming convention FirstInitial.LastName_M01.docx. For example, J.Smith_M01.docx. Remember that it is not necessary to manually type in the file extension; it will automatically append.

Start by reading and following these instructions:

1. Quickly skim the questions or assignment below and the assignment rubric to help you focus.

2. Read the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

3. Consider the discussions and any insights gained from it.

4. Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling.

Module 4: Assignment:Cephalosporins

The causes of non-compliance for the use of this medication is the issue of failure to start therapy, or as a result of the delay in starting the therapy. There are other possible causes of not compliance with the medication including the cases where one omits the medication unintentionally or the patient has a belief of the medication. The frequency of the dosing and the cost that is attached to the antibiotic is as well the main cause of non-compliance to the medication.

Karve and Paul (2016) opine that the cases of noncompliance to Cephalosporins will have consequences such as the reduction in the cure rate and result in the increase in the changes if the developing resistant to the bacteria. In addition, failure to take the medication will increase the chances of the patient visiting the medical practitioner again as a result of the impact of the resistant. This is attributed to the fact that when a patient stops making use of an antibiotic because they feel better, there is a chance that there are a small number of bacteria that will still survive and they will end up building resistance towards the antibiotic. This will result in the need for use of more money and one will end up visiting the healthcare providers again and again.

The best strategy that will help in solving the issue of noncompliance is by having a patient education to help in ensuring that they have an understanding of the importance of adherence to prescriptions. In education, it will be vital that the patients are taught of the risks of noncompliance to the use of Cephalosporins. This can be carried out when the patient has prescribed the medication.

N510 Module 4: Assignment – Rubric Evaluation Results

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Content Weight: 30%

0 points

Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic.

21 points

Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given.

24 points

Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail.

30 points

In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details.

30 / 30

Organization Weight: 25%

0 points

Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant.

17.5 points

Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information.

20 points

Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework. Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information.

25 points

Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms. Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader.

25 / 25

Logic/Argument Weight: 15%

0 points

Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical.

10.5 points

Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak.

12 points

Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.

15 points

Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.

15 / 15

Support Weight: 20%

0 points

Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident.

14 points

Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced.

16 points

Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style.

20 points

Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident.

20 / 20

Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10%

0 points

Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

7 points

Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd. Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

8 points

Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

10 points

Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10 / 10

Total

100 / 100

Overall Score

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

N511` Module 4: Assignment – Pharmaceutical Treatment of Endocrine and Immunity Disorders Web Page