Public health program analysis

Public health program analysis

Identify and describe a public health program that is provided by a local agency in your community, city, or state. Perform a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis on the program. Provide two to three recommendations for improving the program and explain how those changes could be done.
Identify a public health program in your community, city, or state. Research the factors associated with the program and provide the following:

• Identify a public health program.
•  Describe the areas of the program that are considered strong points, weak areas, factors that could be improved, and concerns that could eliminate or reduce the effectiveness of the program.
• Recommend improvements and explain how the improvements could be done.

Public health program analysis

Support your statements with scholarly references and appropriate examples.
Comment on the postings of at least two of your classmates.

Implementation science addresses the extent to which efficacious health interventions can be effectively integrated into real-world public health and clinical service systems.10,11 Implementation science compares multiple evidence-based interventions, identifies strategies to encourage the provision and use of effective health services, promotes the integration of evidence into policy and program

decisions with the goal of adapting interventions to a range of populations and settings, and identifies approaches for scaling up effective interventions to improve health care delivery. The growth of implementation science has been stimulated by US health agencies such as NIH, and the discipline has close links to the public health community of physicians, health care administrators, epidemiologists, statisticians, and others. The Journal has published numerous highly cited examples of implementation science studies, including the work of Wallerstein and Duran,12 Glasgow et al.,13 Scheirer and Dearing,14 and Scheirer15 with many more expected given the high level of interest in this discipline.

In partial contrast, impact evaluation assesses how an intervention affects intended and unintended outcomes, and it involves the invocation of a counterfactual to compare what happened when the intervention was implemented with what would have happened had it not been implemented. The latter is the counterfactual. An array of methods have been developed and are under development to eliminate or at least mitigate the biases that can occur because of the impossibility of turning back the clock and rerunning the alternative intervention with the same population during the same time.

It appears to me that much of the work conducted under the rubric of impact evaluation is focused on effectiveness. Briefly, efficacy denotes the ability of an intervention to produce its desired outcome under idealized, tightly controlled settings, whereas effectiveness refers to the ability of the intervention to produce the desired outcome under large-scale, relatively uncontrolled settings. Establishing strong proxies to counterfactuals—that is, eliminating or largely mitigating the biases to which effectiveness research is susceptible—is considerably more difficult than when efficacy is the focus, although in any case a counterfactual (the ideal comparison for obtaining an unbiased estimate of effect) can be conceptualized even when the researcher is unable to achieve it or even approximate it

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

• Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
• There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
• Include in-text citations in your response
• Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
• Follow APA-7th edition
• Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

• A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
• Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
• Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
• Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
• Follow APA 7th edition
• Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

• Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
• Here are some helpful links
• The is a great resource